Washington Supports Conditional Dam Assistance Offer
John Foster Dulles's government considered American assistance as part of a package requiring Egyptian economic commitments and allied participation.
Secretary of State
John Foster Dulles's government considered American assistance as part of a package requiring Egyptian economic commitments and allied participation.
The United States assessed Egypt's relations with the Soviet bloc while considering whether to finalize support for the Aswan project.
American officials considered financial and political conditions tied to major assistance for the planned Egyptian project.
Washington's concerns about Egypt's international alignment weighed on decisions over the increasingly uncertain financing offer.
John Foster Dulles announced that the United States would not proceed with its proposed financial contribution to the High Dam.
The American financing decision increased tension with Egypt and helped set the political context for Nasser's next dramatic move.
John Foster Dulles's department considered the legal distinction between Egyptian nationalization of a company and international rights of passage through the canal.
John Foster Dulles pursued a negotiated settlement designed to protect navigation without treating immediate armed intervention as the preferred solution.
John Foster Dulles consulted Anthony Eden and British officials about a diplomatic response to nationalization rather than immediate military action.
Dulles urges Britain and France to pursue negotiation rather than immediate military action.
American diplomacy sought a settlement on navigation while the withdrawal of High Dam aid remained an unresolved grievance for Egypt.
John Foster Dulles distinguished the future of unrestricted shipping from the question of who legally owned the nationalized operating company.
John Foster Dulles supported assembling canal users in London to examine a framework for reliable international passage after nationalization.
Supports a maritime conference in London to seek international arrangements for operation of the Suez Canal.
John Foster Dulles argued that the participants should seek internationally agreed arrangements for operating the canal after its nationalization.
John Foster Dulles promoted a plan for a canal board involving Egypt and other states, intended to guarantee navigation under a new international arrangement.
John Foster Dulles helped shape the majority proposal for an internationally responsible canal administration to be negotiated with Egypt.
John Foster Dulles gained support from eighteen participating countries for an international canal arrangement, while other delegations withheld support.
John Foster Dulles's framework was adopted by eighteen governments as a basis for negotiations with Egypt, not as a binding decision of all participants.
John Foster Dulles was the American member of the five-nation committee, with Loy Henderson designated to represent him during the Cairo talks.
Dulles develops the Suez Canal Users Association proposal as a non-military alternative to confrontation.
John Foster Dulles proposed an association through which shipping nations could cooperate over canal operations without immediately resorting to military force.
John Foster Dulles described the association as a body that could help organize the movement of vessels belonging to participating countries.
John Foster Dulles said the proposed association could organize qualified pilots for member shipping, an important practical issue after the withdrawal of foreign pilots.
John Foster Dulles envisioned a system in which canal dues helped meet association costs and provided compensation for services supplied by Egypt.
John Foster Dulles argued that the users association should seek practical cooperation with Egypt rather than assert sovereignty over Egyptian territory.
John Foster Dulles urged a nonmilitary association approach as governments reconsidered their options following Egypt's rejection of the earlier proposals.
Dulles presses for the users association while trying to restrain British and French moves toward force.
John Foster Dulles supported a voluntary canal users association during the second London meeting as a possible alternative to coercion.
John Foster Dulles promoted arrangements under which participating shipping states could finance common services while making appropriate payments to Egypt.
John Foster Dulles advocated an organization of willing canal users rather than an authority imposed directly on Egyptian territory.
John Foster Dulles continued to promote organized user cooperation as an alternative to the military action favored by some British and French policymakers.
Promotes the Suez Canal Users Association as an alternative to immediate military action over the canal dispute.
John Foster Dulles's proposed organization faced the fundamental difficulty that Egypt had not consented to transfer control of the canal to a users body.
Opposes the Anglo-French-Israeli use of force and supports a diplomatic settlement through the United Nations.
John Foster Dulles's approach continued to favor negotiated cooperation rather than forcibly replacing Egyptian control with the proposed association.
Dulles receives reports indicating that Israeli military action against Egypt may be imminent.
John Foster Dulles pressed for United Nations handling of the fighting instead of unilateral Anglo French occupation of the canal zone.
Opposes the Anglo-French invasion of Egypt and backs United Nations action to end the crisis.
Backs the creation of an international emergency force as a way to separate the combatants.