Egypt Explains Development Purpose of Canal Revenue
Egyptian diplomacy defended canal nationalization and emphasized the country's right to direct income from the waterway toward national development.
Foreign Minister
Egyptian diplomacy defended canal nationalization and emphasized the country's right to direct income from the waterway toward national development.
Egyptian diplomacy maintained that nationalization did not mean stopping normal shipping or denying international passage.
Egypt maintained that control of the nationalized canal company did not extinguish its obligation to keep the waterway open to international navigation.
Mahmoud Fawzi stated Egypt's willingness to negotiate an operating arrangement with canal users while preserving Egyptian sovereignty and rights.
Mahmoud Fawzi included fair toll arrangements among Egypt's proposed subjects for negotiation with countries using the waterway.
Mahmoud Fawzi said a reasonable share of canal revenue could be devoted to improvements as part of a negotiated settlement.
Mahmoud Fawzi indicated that Egypt was open to practical arrangements with shipping nations while refusing to surrender the canal's sovereign management.
Mahmoud Fawzi pressed for explicit recognition of Egyptian sovereignty within any internationally accepted framework governing canal operations.
Mahmoud Fawzi emphasized that any settlement framework had to respect Egyptian sovereignty over the nationalized canal.
Mahmoud Fawzi supported a framework allocating a fair share of canal dues to development and improvement of the waterway.
Mahmoud Fawzi's discussions helped establish respect for Egyptian sovereignty as a separate requirement in the six-principle framework.
Mahmoud Fawzi's negotiations helped secure a clause providing for agreement between Egypt and user states over tolls and charges.
Mahmoud Fawzi's position on sovereignty was reflected in Resolution 118, which explicitly required respect for Egypt's sovereign rights.
The unanimously agreed Security Council text recognized Egypt's sovereignty, reflecting a central Egyptian objection to international control of the waterway.
Mahmoud Fawzi continued to confront disagreements over how the six accepted principles would translate into actual control and administration of the canal.
Egypt appealed for international action after Israeli forces crossed into Sinai and British and French governments issued their ultimatum.
Mahmoud Fawzi's government rejected the external attempt to impose foreign forces on Egyptian territory while it was resisting the Israeli attack.
Mahmoud Fawzi's government appealed for international protection of Egyptian sovereignty during the first emergency special session.
Mahmoud Fawzi's government supported demands to stop the attacks and withdraw foreign troops from Egyptian territory.
Egyptian officials expected international efforts to remove obstructions to respect the country's ownership and administration of the waterway.