Permanent historical factsheet

Stennis Compromise

United States of America · Politics / Watergate. Chronological records rendered directly from the World History Database.

7Records
1973Date range
3Named people
1Places

Chronological records

1973

Archibald Cox19 October 1973

Politics / Watergate

Cox refused the compromise

Archibald Cox19 October 1973

Politics / Watergate

Nixon, looking toward a solution to the tape dispute, offered what later came to known as the Stennis Compromise. U.S. Senator John C. Stennis (D-MS) would independently review the tapes and summarize them for the special prosecutor's office.

Richard Milhous Nixon19 October 1973

Politics / Watergate

Nixon, looking toward a solution to the tape dispute, offered what later came to known as the Stennis Compromise. U.S. Senator John C. Stennis (D-MS) would independently review the tapes and summarize them for the special prosecutor's office

Richard Milhous Nixon19 October 1973

Washington · Politics / Watergate

Proposes that Senator John Stennis review Watergate tapes and authenticate presidential summaries instead of giving the recordings directly to Special Prosecutor Cox.

John Cornelius Stennis19 October 1973

Politics / Watergate

Cox refused the compromise

John Cornelius Stennis19 October 1973

Politics / Watergate

Nixon, looking toward a solution to the tape dispute, offered what later came to known as the Stennis Compromise. U.S. Senator John C. Stennis (D-MS) would independently review the tapes and summarize them for the special prosecutor's office.

John Cornelius Stennis19 October 1973

Washington · Politics / Watergate

Is proposed as the independent reviewer who would authenticate presidential summaries of subpoenaed Watergate tapes under Nixon's proposed compromise.

Names involved

Archibald CoxJohn Cornelius StennisRichard Milhous Nixon

Provenance

This factsheet is generated from stored World History Database records matching the country, broad category, detailed category and exact Event value shown above. Duplicate display records are collapsed; database wording is otherwise preserved. Source provenance varies by record, so formal academic citation should be checked against the relevant primary source, archive or specialist historical reference.