Karl Brandt Defence Case Begins
Brandt begins his defence against charges involving medical experiments, euthanasia policy and responsibility within the Nazi health system.
17 historical records assigned to this proceeding.
Brandt begins his defence against charges involving medical experiments, euthanasia policy and responsibility within the Nazi health system.
Handloser's defence addresses command responsibility within the German armed forces medical service and his connection to wartime experimentation.
Rostock opens his defence against allegations concerning the organisation and coordination of criminal medical research.
Schroeder's defence examines his Luftwaffe medical responsibilities and the evidence connecting him to experiments on concentration-camp prisoners.
Genzken begins answering charges arising from his senior medical role in the Waffen-SS and alleged participation in experimentation.
Gebhardt opens his defence concerning surgical experiments, SS medical authority and operations conducted on prisoners at Ravensbrueck.
Fischer begins his defence over his work as Gebhardt's assistant and his participation in experimental surgery on prisoners.
Blome answers allegations involving biological warfare, medical research administration and the Nazi euthanasia programme.
Rudolf Brandt begins his defence concerning administrative support for SS medical programmes and correspondence handled for Heinrich Himmler.
Mrugowsky's defence addresses vaccine research, camp experiments and his leadership role in the Waffen-SS Hygiene Institute.
Oberheuser begins her defence concerning medical experiments performed on women imprisoned at Ravensbrueck.
Poppendick opens his defence against charges connected with SS racial institutions and criminal medical experimentation.
Sievers begins his defence over the Ahnenerbe's role in medical experiments and the Jewish skeleton collection project.
Rose opens his defence concerning typhus research, vaccine testing and experiments carried out on concentration-camp prisoners.
Ruff begins his defence regarding aviation medicine and the high-altitude experiments conducted at Dachau.
Oeschey's defence addresses his work in special courts and the prosecution's claim that judicial authority became an instrument of persecution.
Maria Hanfova gives evidence as the prosecution documents the human effects of racial selection and occupation policy.