Menzies Delegation Received
Nasser received a delegation led by Australian Prime Minister Robert Menzies to discuss proposals drawn from the London canal conference.
Role range: 1956-1970
Follow Gamal Abdel Nasser through 277 dated historical records for Egypt.
A chronological timeline drawn from matching World History Database records.
Nasser received a delegation led by Australian Prime Minister Robert Menzies to discuss proposals drawn from the London canal conference.
Role range: 1956-1970
Gamal Abdel Nasser received the committee chaired by Robert Menzies and heard the proposal supported by eighteen London Conference governments.
Role range: 1956-1956
Gamal Abdel Nasser resisted an arrangement that would transfer effective operational authority over the canal to an international body.
Role range: 1956-1956
After discussions with the Menzies delegation, Nasser rejected a proposed international operating arrangement that he considered incompatible with national control.
Role range: 1956-1970
Gamal Abdel Nasser rejected the proposal advanced by the five-nation committee because it would compromise Egypt's control of the canal.
Role range: 1956-1956
Egyptian authorities kept canal traffic operating after the withdrawal of many foreign pilots, strengthening claims of operational competence.
Role range: 1956-1957
Britain and France requested Security Council consideration of the canal dispute on 23 September; Egypt prepared to defend the legality of its takeover.
Role range: 1956-1970
Egypt asked the Security Council to consider British and French actions that it characterised as threats to international peace and Egyptian sovereignty.
Role range: 1956-1970
The Security Council opened debate on the canal dispute on 26 September, with Egypt defending national control against British and French objections.
Role range: 1956-1970
Egypt opposed the proposed Suez Canal Users Association as a means of displacing Egyptian management through a foreign directed shipping arrangement.
Role range: 1956-1970
Nasser’s government resisted proposals for canal dues to be collected outside Egyptian control, regarding such measures as pressure on the nationalised authority.
Role range: 1956-1970
Egypt’s diplomatic complaint warned the United Nations that British and French pressure over nationalisation threatened international peace and security.
Role range: 1956-1970
In discussions following the London conference, Egypt argued for negotiated international assurances that preserved Egyptian administration of the canal.
Role range: 1956-1970
Egypt reaffirmed the nationalisation decree’s commitment to compensate shareholders, responding to foreign allegations that the takeover amounted to confiscation.
Role range: 1956-1970
Nasser’s government presented the Egyptian canal authority as the lawful operator of the waterway despite external proposals to transfer traffic management elsewhere.
Role range: 1956-1970
Egypt participated in diplomacy around six broad principles unanimously endorsed by Security Council resolution 118, while questions about their implementation remained unsettled.
Role range: 1956-1970
The Security Council’s six principles required free and open passage through the canal, a key issue in negotiations between Egypt and maritime users.
Role range: 1956-1970
The October Security Council framework recognised the need to respect Egyptian sovereignty while negotiating arrangements for international canal use.
Role range: 1956-1970
One of the agreed Security Council principles called for canal tolls to be determined by agreement between Egypt and users rather than unilaterally imposed on shipping.
Role range: 1956-1970
The Security Council’s principles contemplated assigning a fair proportion of canal dues to development, an issue directly connected to Egypt’s infrastructure ambitions.
Role range: 1956-1970
A Security Council principle envisaged arbitration for unresolved disputes between the Suez Canal Company arrangements and user interests, offering a procedural path to settlement.
Role range: 1956-1970
Egypt joined Jordan and Syria in a military agreement signed in Amman on 24 October to coordinate their forces against attacks on any signatory.
Role range: 1956-1970
The October agreement with Jordan and Syria called for unified defence fronts, military planning and reciprocal assistance in the event of aggression.
Role range: 1956-1970
Britain and France delivered an ultimatum on 30 October demanding that Egypt and Israel withdraw from the canal and allow foreign forces to occupy key points.
Role range: 1956-1970
Nasser rejected the ultimatum, refusing to accept British and French military positions in Egyptian territory under the stated pretext of protecting shipping.
Role range: 1956-1970
Gamal Abdel Nasser's government refused the ultimatum because accepting Anglo French occupation of canal positions would violate Egyptian sovereignty.
Role range: 1956-1957
British and French vetoes prevented the Security Council from adopting an immediate resolution demanding withdrawal, pushing the crisis into the General Assembly.
Role range: 1956-1970
Gamal Abdel Nasser's government sought international condemnation of the air offensive launched after Egypt rejected the ultimatum.
Role range: 1956-1957
Anglo French air attacks and Egyptian defensive measures turned the canal zone into a combat area and threatened ordinary navigation.
Role range: 1956-1957
Egypt defended its right to own the canal operating company during international discussions, distinguishing that question from guarantees of navigation.
Role range: 1956-1970
The United Nations General Assembly convened its first emergency special session to address the attacks on Egypt after Security Council action was blocked.
Role range: 1956-1970
Gamal Abdel Nasser denounced British and French bombing as an attack on Egyptian sovereignty and pledged resistance to the intervention.
Role range: 1956-1956
Egyptian crews sank vessels in the canal, creating blockages that prevented ordinary commercial transit during the war.
Role range: 1956-1957
The United Nations General Assembly called for an immediate ceasefire and withdrawal of foreign forces on 2 November; Egypt supported an end to the invasion.
Role range: 1956-1970
Egypt welcomed international demands for a halt to hostilities and withdrawal behind armistice lines as the invasion continued.
Role range: 1956-1970
Gamal Abdel Nasser's government supported international action to end the offensive and secure the removal of invading forces.
Role range: 1956-1957
The General Assembly asked for a plan to establish an emergency international force with the consent of concerned countries, setting the stage for UNEF.
Role range: 1956-1970
The original United Nations proposal for an emergency force stipulated consent from the countries concerned, giving Egypt a decisive role in its deployment.
Role range: 1956-1970
British and French airborne forces attacked the Port Said area on 5 November, opening the ground phase of their intervention against Egypt.
Role range: 1956-1970
Nasser called for national resistance as military defenders and civilians opposed the Anglo French assault at the northern entrance to the canal.
Role range: 1956-1970
These dates and descriptions come from the historical_events database. Exact duplicate records have been collapsed. Names are grouped by the country, Name 2 and Name 1 fields; records with missing Name 2 cannot be reliably assigned to an individual biography. Check the underlying sources before formal citation.