Restoration
Louis XVI was restored to the throne under the Constitution.
Permanent historical records · Updated 2026-11-03
1791 in France — Page 8
Explore 592 historical events and records for France in 1791.
Historical records for France in 1791
Sorted by month and day. Records with no month are shown last. Showing 40 of 592 unique records.
592Unique records
8 of 15Page
29Named events on this page
16Named people on this page
2Places on this page
July
Restoration
Reinstated to the throne of France
Assembly restores royal inviolability: Debate over public consent
Petion represented a more democratic current increasingly uneasy about preserving Louis XVI without an effective popular choice. Legislative disagreement contributed to the organizing of petitions beyond the Assembly.
Assembly restores royal inviolability: Legal defence of the crown
Barnave argued that the constitutional settlement required protection of royal inviolability despite Louis XVI's flight. This defence angered those who believed the king had forfeited the nation's confidence.
Assembly restores royal inviolability: Popular sovereignty dispute
Robespierre resisted treating the attempted escape as politically inconsequential for France's emerging constitution. The disagreement widened the gulf between revolutionary radicals and defenders of constitutional monarchy.
Danton supports a new decision on kingship
Danton's circle insisted that the nation should reconsider Louis XVI's position after Varennes. The episode concerned republican petitions become flashpoint and affected the relationship between club activists and public authority.
Desmoulins publicizes republican alternatives
Desmoulins argued that constitutional liberty could require limiting or replacing hereditary power. This aspect of republican petitions become flashpoint illustrates how press campaigns, popular sections and government decisions became connected.
Inviolability Debate
Deputies debated whether Louis XVI remained constitutionally inviolable after Varennes, exposing deep disagreement over the future of monarchy.
Robert advocates republican petition campaign
Robert was among the Cordeliers figures pressing for a public challenge to the restoration of royal authority. The controversy surrounding republican petitions become flashpoint influenced the changing balance among revolutionary factions.
Royal inviolability defended
Barnave argued for maintaining the constitutional principle of royal inviolability during debates following the flight. The position sought to separate criticism of the king's actions from abolition of monarchy.
Royal inviolability defended - Impact on the royal family
Antoine Pierre Joseph Marie Barnave figured in events surrounding royal inviolability defended at Paris. The position sought to separate criticism of the king's actions from abolition of monarchy. It left Louis XVI and his relatives subject to closer political supervision and damaged the prestige of the court.
Royal Inviolability Speech
Barnave defended royal inviolability and constitutional monarchy after the Flight to Varennes.
Bailly opposes republican petition pressure
Following the Varennes crisis, republican campaigners demanded action against Louis XVI. Bailly resisted the claim that the city government should independently overturn the constitutional arrangements being prepared by the Assembly.
Constitutional Monarchists Leave Jacobin Club
Barnave joined political moderates who broke from the Jacobin Club amid dispute over the king's future. The departing members helped create the Feuillant alignment.
Extension of Royal Suspension
The Assembly continued Louis XVI's suspension until the completed Constitution could be formally presented to him.
Feuillant Club
Adrien Duport joined the Feuillant split after the Varennes crisis.
Feuillant Club
Joins the Feuillant split after the Varennes crisis
Feuillant Club
Alexandre Lameth joined the moderate constitutional monarchist Feuillant Club.
Feuillant Club
Joins the moderate constitutional monarchist Feuillant Club
Feuillant Club
Charles Lameth joined the Feuillant split from the Jacobin Club.
Feuillant Club
Joins the Feuillant split from the Jacobin Club
Feuillant Split
Moderate constitutional monarchists leave the Jacobin Club and form the Feuillant Club after the crisis over the king
Feuillant Split
Moderate constitutional monarchists leave the Jacobin Club and form the Feuillant Club after the crisis over the king.
Feuillant Split
Antoine Pierre Joseph Marie Barnave joined moderate constitutional monarchists who leave the Jacobin Club for the Feuillants.
Feuillant Split
Joins moderate constitutional monarchists who leave the Jacobin Club for the Feuillants
Jacobin split over royal question: Cordeliers seek independent pressure
Danton and fellow Cordeliers favored mobilization outside parliamentary circles to contest restoration of the king. Their approach helped create the setting for the next day's petition at the Champ de Mars.
Jacobin split over royal question: Moderates leave Jacobins
Barnave joined constitutional monarchists who broke away from the Jacobin Club amid arguments over the fate of Louis XVI. The division helped produce the Feuillant political alignment.
Jacobin split over royal question: Remaining Jacobin opposition
Robespierre remained in the Jacobin camp while constitutional monarchists separated from its increasingly radical membership. The split made conflict over popular petitions and public order more visible.
Bailly declares martial law at Champ de Mars
Bailly proclaimed martial law as a mass petitioning crowd gathered at the Champ de Mars. His decision provided the legal framework under which armed guards attempted to disperse demonstrators.
Bailly implicated in fatal Champ de Mars firing
National Guards fired into the crowd during the Champ de Mars confrontation, killing demonstrators. Bailly's role in authorizing martial law severely damaged his reputation among republicans and radicals.
Champ de Mars
The Champ de Mars massacre deepens the division between moderate constitutionalists and more radical Jacobins
Champ de Mars
The Champ de Mars massacre deepens the division between moderate constitutionalists and more radical Jacobins.
Champ de Mars demonstration suppressed
National Guards under Lafayette confronted a crowd petitioning against the monarchy at the Champ de Mars. The resulting bloodshed exposed the deep political divisions produced by the Varennes crisis.
Champ de Mars demonstration suppressed - Political significance
Gilbert du Motier Lafayette figured in events surrounding champ de mars demonstration suppressed at Champ de Mars. The resulting bloodshed exposed the deep political divisions produced by the Varennes crisis. The crisis intensified the divide between constitutional monarchists and activists who doubted that the king could be trusted.
Champ de Mars Massacre
The massacre deepens the split between radical Jacobins and moderate constitutionalists
Champ de Mars Massacre
The massacre deepens the split between radical Jacobins and moderate constitutionalists.
Champ de Mars shootings polarize reformers
The National Guard's firing on demonstrators at the Champ de Mars intensified splits within the revolutionary movement. Brissot's political milieu became more skeptical of coercion used to shield the monarchy.
Champ de Mars Suppression
Lafayette commanded National Guard forces during the violent suppression of the republican petitioners at the Champ de Mars.
Danton associated with Champ de Mars petition movement
Danton was linked to the radical petitioning movement that authorities sought to suppress. The episode concerned crowd gathers for republican petition and affected the relationship between club activists and public authority.
Deaths beneath the patriotic altar: Killings provoke security intervention
Bailly's municipal authorities reacted after two men were discovered and killed by members of the crowd near the altar. The episode provided the immediate pretext for extraordinary measures against the gathering.
How these records were prepared
Generated from the World History Database historical_events table. Identical display records are collapsed; descriptions otherwise retain the stored text. Coverage and source quality vary. Check primary and specialist sources before citing individual historical claims.