Indictment Served at Nuremberg
The International Military Tribunal served the indictment, Charter and notice of rights on him at Nuremberg.
Role range: 1939-1945
Follow Hermann Wilhelm Goering through 66 dated historical records for Germany.
A chronological timeline drawn from matching World History Database records.
The International Military Tribunal served the indictment, Charter and notice of rights on him at Nuremberg.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering was personally served in German with the IMT indictment, the Tribunal Charter, procedural notice and information concerning his right to legal counsel.
Role range: 1939-1945
The indictment before the Tribunal charged Goering under all four counts: conspiracy, crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Role range: 1939-1945
He entered a plea of not guilty before the International Military Tribunal.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering appears with the other defendants as the Tribunal records pleas to the indictment at the beginning of the proceedings.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering entered a plea of not guilty when the defendants were individually called upon to answer the charges set out in the indictment.
Role range: 1939-1945
In the American opening case, Robert Jackson presented Goering as one of the central surviving leaders whose offices and authority connected him to the alleged Nazi conspiracy.
Role range: 1939-1945
The prosecution connected Goering with meetings and administrative measures that mobilized industrial resources, finance and production for the expansion of German military power.
Role range: 1939-1945
American prosecutors introduced evidence that Goering directed the Four Year Plan and exercised broad economic powers used to accelerate German rearmament and war preparation.
Role range: 1939-1945
Prosecutors presented records showing that Goering was informed of plans for operations in the East and held senior responsibility for economic preparations connected with the invasion.
Role range: 1939-1945
The prosecution introduced laws and statements identifying Goering as the official who created and organized the Prussian Secret State Police before its later national expansion.
Role range: 1939-1945
Evidence on forced labour emphasized that Sauckel operated within the Four Year Plan structure for which Goering held overarching authority as its plenipotentiary.
Role range: 1939-1945
The prosecution cited wartime directives attributed to Goering concerning the use of Soviet civilians and prisoners of war as labour within the German war economy.
Role range: 1939-1945
Karl Bodenschatz testified about Goering's pre-war contacts and statements, presenting the defence argument that Goering had attempted to preserve peaceful relations with Britain.
Role range: 1939-1945
Bodenschatz described Goering's explanation that the Four Year Plan was intended to secure strategic raw materials and reduce Germany's dependence on foreign imports.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering's defence case began with testimony from witnesses chosen to address his political intentions, Luftwaffe leadership, economic authority and relationship with Hitler.
Role range: 1939-1945
Erhard Milch began evidence for Goering's defence, addressing Luftwaffe administration, wartime decision-making and the internal relationship between Goering and Hitler.
Role range: 1939-1945
During continued testimony, Milch described conversations indicating that Goering had reservations about attacking the Soviet Union and understood the danger of a prolonged eastern war.
Role range: 1939-1945
Bernd von Brauchitsch testified about his service around Goering's Luftwaffe headquarters and provided evidence concerning command routines and senior military communications.
Role range: 1939-1945
Albert Kesselring gave evidence about Luftwaffe development and command, supporting parts of Goering's defence concerning air-force policy before and during the war.
Role range: 1939-1945
Paul Koerner described Goering's position within the Four Year Plan organization and the administrative machinery through which economic directives were transmitted.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering testified in his own defence before the International Military Tribunal.
Role range: 1939-1945
His testimony described his early position in the Nazi movement and sought to explain how his political authority developed before the party entered government.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering opened his evidence with an account of his upbringing, military career, First World War service and eventual entry into Hitler's political movement.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering took the witness stand, gave his name and repeated the oath before beginning the lengthy personal testimony presented in his own defence.
Role range: 1939-1945
During Kesselring's cross-examination, prosecutors drew attention to Goering's responsibility for establishing the Prussian Gestapo and questioned claims about limited knowledge of persecution.
Role range: 1939-1945
Kesselring stated that Goering was the principal channel through which Luftwaffe information and views could reach Hitler at the highest level of command.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering testified in his own defence before the International Military Tribunal.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering discussed the Nazi Party programme, his acceptance of its broad aims and the methods by which the movement intended to obtain and exercise political power.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering described the early security structure under his control and defended measures taken against political opponents during the establishment of the Nazi state.
Role range: 1939-1945
His evidence addressed German rearmament and the rebuilding of military strength, presenting these policies as responses to Germany's strategic and political position.
Role range: 1939-1945
The defence examination moved through the consolidation of Nazi rule, with Goering explaining governmental changes and his own expanding authority after Hitler became chancellor.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering testified in his own defence before the International Military Tribunal.
Role range: 1939-1945
He argued that German leaders doubted whether Belgian and Dutch neutrality would remain effective during a major war in western Europe.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering testified about the military reasoning used to justify operations against the Netherlands and Belgium during the western campaign of 1940.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering described Luftwaffe planning and operational considerations while defending his conduct as commander-in-chief during the opening campaigns of the war.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering testified in his own defence before the International Military Tribunal.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering acknowledged that the decision to send German forces into Austria rested with Hitler and himself, irrespective of subsequent political telegrams from Vienna.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering addressed his formal position connected with the Reich Defence Council and asserted that the body described in the relevant law had not functioned as alleged.
Role range: 1939-1945
Goering explained his view that senior officers could express disagreement in peacetime but were expected to obey once Hitler had made a final decision.
Role range: 1939-1945
These dates and descriptions come from the historical_events database. Exact duplicate records have been collapsed. Names are grouped by the country, Name 2 and Name 1 fields; records with missing Name 2 cannot be reliably assigned to an individual biography. Check the underlying sources before formal citation.