Orgreave Police Evidence
The police evidence used in prosecutions stemming from the 18 June clashes later became heavily contested.
Follow Arthur Scargill through 116 dated historical records for Great Britain.
A chronological timeline drawn from matching World History Database records.
The police evidence used in prosecutions stemming from the 18 June clashes later became heavily contested.
The NUM leadership faced strong opposition from miners in Nottinghamshire who wanted a national ballot.
Differences over a national strike ballot left many Nottinghamshire miners unwilling to join industrial action.
Conflicts between local working miners and incoming pickets worsened as the strike continued.
An area ballot showed divided opinion among Nottinghamshire miners about joining the stoppage.
Most Nottinghamshire miners continued working while many miners elsewhere stayed on strike.
Working miners organised to represent those opposing an area wide strike.
Disagreements about union rules led working miners to seek legal remedies against strike related decisions.
NUM branch contests reflected the divisions between striking and working miners.
Tensions within the Nottinghamshire NUM led to an occupation at the Berry Hill area headquarters.
Mining families and supporters organised practical assistance for households affected by the prolonged dispute.
Union finances and support for pickets became more contentious as the strike continued into autumn.
Disagreement about NUM rules and authority intensified between the union leadership and local members.
Union votes to expel Nottinghamshire
The union voted to expel its Nottinghamshire area amid the bitter division over continued working.
The national union voted to expel the Nottinghamshire area after a prolonged dispute over continued working.
Miners reject peace plan by trades unionleaders and Government
More than 50 perent of miners back at work
Delegates at an NUM conference decide 98 to 91 to end the strike
The year long miners strike is called off
The national strike ended while Nottinghamshire remained divided over the years events.
Miners returned to their pits after the union conference ended the dispute without a closure settlement.
Prosecutions of miners over the Orgreave confrontation collapsed amid concerns about police evidence.
The failure of serious prosecutions fuelled claims that the policing of Orgreave required independent examination.
Former pickets and mining families continued to dispute the official depiction of the 1984 confrontation.
Working miners in Nottinghamshire developed separate representation as relations with the national union deteriorated.
Disputes over membership and representation foreshadowed an enduring organisational split in the miners movement.
The Union of Democratic Mineworkers emerged from divisions involving Nottinghamshire working miners after the strike.
The new Union of Democratic Mineworkers formalised a split from the National Union of Mineworkers.
Questions persisted over the reliability of police statements and the conduct of the original Orgreave prosecutions.
Campaigners continued to seek acknowledgement of what happened to miners arrested at Orgreave.
The thirtieth anniversary renewed public attention to the events of June 1984 and demands for accountability.
Renewed scrutiny of police actions and prosecutions kept the Orgreave controversy in public discussion.
The government declined to establish an inquiry into Orgreave despite campaigning by miners and their supporters.
Commemorations of the 1984 confrontation highlighted the experiences of pickets and ongoing demands for a public inquiry.
A statutory inquiry was established to examine the June 1984 Orgreave events and subsequent prosecution decisions.
These dates and descriptions come from the historical_events database. Exact duplicate records have been collapsed. Names are grouped by the country, Name 2 and Name 1 fields; records with missing Name 2 cannot be reliably assigned to an individual biography. Check the underlying sources before formal citation.