New Model Army Cavalry Command
Ireton receives senior cavalry command in the New Model Army as Parliament reorganises its field forces.
English Civil War · permanent subject timeline
New Model Army officer and major political participant in the Putney debates. This page combines historical context with 30 matching records drawn directly from the World History Database English Civil War archive.
Historical context
Henry Ireton became a senior New Model Army commander and a leading voice among the army's political 'Grandees'. He played a major role in constitutional negotiations and the Putney Debates.
Ireton linked battlefield command with the army's increasingly important political role. His arguments at Putney and involvement in the regicide made him a central figure of the revolutionary settlement.
World History Database records
The records below are selected from the 1,090-record English Civil War archive and rendered as static HTML in chronological order.
New Model Army Cavalry Command
Ireton receives senior cavalry command in the New Model Army as Parliament reorganises its field forces.
Mobilization
Leads a cavalry at the Battle of Naseby against the Royalists
Battle of Naseby
Ireton leads Parliamentarian cavalry on the left and is captured during the early fighting at Naseby.
Battle of Naseby
Fights at the Battle of Naseby for Parliament against Charles I
Wounding at Naseby
Ireton is wounded in the thigh and face and is briefly captured during the fighting at Naseby.
Storming of Bristol
Ireton returns to active service after Naseby and takes part in the New Model Army's successful assault on Bristol.
Peace
Receives Charles Is peace offer to the Independents & communicates it to Cromwell
Army Grievances
Ireton helps turn the soldiers' complaints over pay, indemnity and disbandment into a coordinated Army political programme.
Solemn Engagement
Ireton supports the Army's Solemn Engagement, binding the soldiers together against disbandment before their grievances are settled.
Army Council
Ireton helps shape the Army's political position as the Army Council issues a declaration explaining why the soldiers will not submit to disbandment on Parliament's terms
Grandees
Ireton helps shape the Grandees' moderate constitutional programme, drafting the Heads of the Proposals to secure limited monarchy, parliamentary reform and protection for the Army
Heads of the Proposals
Ireton presents a draft settlement to the General Council of the Army, seeking a constitutional agreement after the First Civil War that would limit monarchy while avoiding the harsher Newcastle Propositions
Army Council
Ireton's Heads of the Proposals are advanced as the Army leadership's constitutional settlement, aiming to restore Charles I under limited monarchy while protecting Parliament and the Army
Putney Debates
Ireton explains that The Case of the Army had been referred to a committee, creating the immediate reason for inviting the New Agents to state their principles at Putney
Putney Debates
Ireton supports committee examination of The Case of the Army, because the Grandees want the New Agents' demands tested before the Army accepts any radical settlement
Agitators
Ireton opposes the Agitators' demand for a broad male franchise, warning that giving political power to men without property could endanger civil order and property rights
Agreement of the People
Ireton opposes the Agreement of the People's broad franchise, warning that political power without a fixed interest in the kingdom could threaten property and civil order
Grandees
Ireton becomes the leading spokesman for the Grandees at Putney, opposing universal or near-universal male suffrage and arguing that political power should rest with those who have a fixed interest in the kingdom
Heads of the Proposals
Ireton defends the Heads of the Proposals during the Army debates at Putney, presenting them as a lawful and balanced alternative to the Leveller Agreement of the People
Levellers
Ireton opposes the Leveller demand for a broad franchise, warning that political power without a fixed interest in the kingdom could threaten property and civil order
Putney Debates
Ireton opposes the Leveller demand for a broad male franchise, arguing that political power should rest with those who have a fixed interest in the kingdom
Putney Debates
Ireton replies that voting rights should belong to those with a permanent fixed interest in the kingdom, because otherwise property and civil order might be endangered
Putney Debates
Ireton defends the Army's earlier proposals and argues that peace must be settled through a lawful authority rather than by the Army alone
Putney Debates
Ireton supports modifying the Agreement rather than adopting the Leveller draft unchanged, producing a limited result short of the radicals' full programme
Putney Debates
Ireton's moderate constitutional line prevails over the Leveller demand for the Agreement to become the Army's official settlement programme
Army Remonstrance
Ireton helps shape the Army Remonstrance demanding justice against Charles I after the renewed fighting of the Second Civil War.
Long Parliament
Divisions emerge culminating in Prides Purge when, under the orders of Oliver Cromwell's son-in-law Henry Ireton, Colonel Pride physically bars about half of the members of Parliament from taking their seats
Prides Purge
Divisions emerge culminating in Prides Purge when, under the orders of Oliver Cromwell's son-in-law Henry Ireton, Colonel Pride physically bars about half of the members of Parliament from taking their seats
Treaty of Newport
Asks Pride to exclude from Parliament those who had voted for the Newport Treaty
Death Warrant of Charles I
Ireton signs the death warrant authorising the execution of Charles I after the King's conviction by the High Court.
Editorial provenance
Compiled and edited by World History Database.
Historical context is editorial material; the chronology is generated from World History Database English Civil War records.
Last reviewed: September 2026.
English Heritage · National Army Museum · UK Parliament · Cromwell Museum
Continue exploring