Alamanni Occupy Elevated Ground
The Alamannic army's position on high and difficult ground complicated the Roman advance toward its opponents.
Explore 35 historical events and records for Roman Empire in 368.
Sorted by month and day. Records with no month are shown last. Showing 35 of 35 unique records.
The Alamannic army's position on high and difficult ground complicated the Roman advance toward its opponents.
The Alamannic force resisted the advance of imperial troops before being driven from its defended position.
The reverse experienced by the Alamanni reduced immediate pressure on Roman military positions in the region.
The defeat deprived the Alamannic fighters of their tactical advantage in the contested terrain.
Alamannic raids into Roman Gaul formed the wider military setting for Valentinian's campaign culminating at Solicinium.
Ammianus Marcellinus provides the principal surviving narrative of Valentinian's operations against the Alamanni.
Modern accounts vary between 367 and 368 for the battle, making the precise chronology uncertain.
Later reconstructions of the Roman Alamannic wars draw on Ammianus to place Solicinium in Valentinian's campaigning.
Roman infantry faced strenuous conditions in the terrain associated with the engagement against the Alamanni.
The engagement was fought in broken terrain where heights and approaches influenced Roman tactical decisions.
The imperial troops ultimately prevailed against the Alamannic force at the engagement traditionally called Solicinium.
Mounted elements formed part of the Roman field army during the western frontier wars of Valentinian.
Although the Romans won, the campaign was remembered as costly to their own troops.
Ancient narratives describe Roman efforts to locate and confront Alamannic troops occupying defensible ground.
The attacking Roman troops had to cope with difficult slopes as they closed with Alamannic opponents.
Roman commanders manoeuvred to overcome the advantage held by fighters positioned on elevated terrain.
Roman forces assembled to confront Alamannic fighters in the difficult terrain of the upper Rhine region.
The officer Sebastianus is named in accounts of the military operations directed against Alamannic opponents.
The clash demonstrated that defending Gaul through offensive warfare could exact heavy casualties even in victory.
The precise location of the battlefield called Solicinium has not been securely identified by historians.
Ancient accounts characterise the conflict as a difficult engagement with serious losses among Roman soldiers.
The battle illustrates Valentinian's policy of meeting hostile frontier forces with aggressive field campaigns.
Valentinian dispatched Count Theodosius to restore military order in Britain after widespread attacks.
Victories in Gaul strengthened the emperor's claim to have secured Roman borders against invasion.
The emperor's presence at the battle placed the conduct of the operation under direct imperial scrutiny.
Emperor Valentinian I personally supervised the Roman effort to counter incursions from across the Rhine frontier.
Sebastianus is associated with Roman operations against the Alamanni during Valentinian's western campaigns.
An account of the campaign describes Valentinian being exposed to danger while fighting on difficult ground.
The imperial army went on the offensive rather than remain exclusively behind the Rhine fortifications.
Valentinian survived the dangerous fighting and continued to direct the western empire after the battle.
Ammianus describes the emperor coming into personal danger while advancing during the operations against the Alamanni.
Valentinian secured victory over Alamannic opponents at Solicinium, though Roman losses were substantial.
Alamannic conflict continued beyond Solicinium despite the immediate Roman military success.
The Roman success formed part of a broader effort to reduce threats to the Rhine frontier provinces.
Victory against the Alamanni reinforced the image of Valentinian as a defender of the western provinces.
Generated from the World History Database historical_events table. Identical display records are collapsed; descriptions otherwise retain the stored text. Coverage and source quality vary. Check primary and specialist sources before citing individual historical claims.