Lauterbacher Testifies on Nazi Party Leadership
Lauterbacher answers questions concerning Party leadership structures and responsibilities within the Nazi political organization.
Explore 239 historical events and records for Germany in 1946.
Sorted by month and day. Records with no month are shown last. Showing 40 of 239 unique records.
Lauterbacher answers questions concerning Party leadership structures and responsibilities within the Nazi political organization.
Sauckel testified about his responsibilities for labour mobilisation during the war.
Sauckel testified about his responsibilities for labour mobilisation during the war.
Sauckel testified about his responsibilities for labour mobilisation during the war.
Sauckel testified about his responsibilities for labour mobilisation during the war.
Timm appears for Sauckel's defence and addresses labour administration, recruitment practices and the operation of wartime manpower offices.
Hildebrandt appears during Sauckel's defence and addresses the organization and operation of wartime labour administration.
Jodl testified in his own defence regarding German military planning and operations.
Jodl testified in his own defence regarding German military planning and operations.
Jodl testified in his own defence regarding German military planning and operations.
Jodl testified in his own defence regarding German military planning and operations.
Jodl testified in his own defence regarding German military planning and operations.
Winter gives evidence concerning staff procedures and command relationships relied upon by the defence of the German High Command.
Speer acknowledged that he knew foreign workers were being used in Germany against their will while his ministry continued to demand manpower for war production.
Speer discussed his role in central economic planning and the relationship between his armaments responsibilities, industrial production and requests for labour.
The defence questioned Speer about underground armaments plants, and he described their scale, technical requirements and the composition of the labour force used there.
He denied that his ministry had promoted terror as a normal method for increasing output and argued that sustained industrial production depended on effective working conditions.
Speer described how he moved from architecture into wartime administration and succeeded Fritz Todt as Reich Minister responsible for armaments and munitions in 1942.
Speer described a wartime visit to Mauthausen undertaken while inspecting industrial projects and explained what he said he knew about work and construction around the camp.
Speer testified about the employment of concentration-camp prisoners in armaments factories and described the conditions he claimed to have observed during industrial inspections.
The defence examined how Speer's offices submitted labour requirements for armaments production while the actual recruitment and allocation machinery operated through other agencies.
Speer outlined the industrial committees, ministry offices and production controls through which his administration attempted to increase armaments output during the later war years.
His testimony traced the enlargement of his ministry's authority over armaments production and explained the administrative structure used to coordinate German war industry.
Speer rejected the suggestion that deliberate exhaustion or destruction of workers could serve armaments industry, arguing that such turnover would undermine production itself.
Speer took the witness stand, stated his full name and swore the Tribunal's oath before beginning his evidence in his own defence.
He stated that he accepted responsibility for directives issued within his own sphere and for Hitler's orders that he personally implemented, while distinguishing actions he did not execute.
Speer told the Tribunal that, as an important member of the Reich leadership from 1942, he accepted a share of responsibility for the catastrophe produced by the war.
Speer told the Tribunal that the sacrifices made after January 1945 were senseless and argued that continued fighting only increased deaths and destruction after defeat had become inevitable.
Speer testified that he devoted his full efforts to maximizing German armaments production until the middle of January 1945, when his conduct began to change.
His testimony described measures taken during the final months of the conflict that he said were intended to reduce destruction and bring an already lost war to an earlier end.
Speer explained efforts to limit demolition of bridges and communications infrastructure, including discussions with military commanders as Allied forces advanced into Germany.
Speer described intervening against proposed destruction of industrial facilities in western occupied territories and said he accepted personal responsibility for preventing some demolitions.
Speer testified that he opposed Hitler's scorched-earth policy because destruction of factories, utilities and transport systems would leave the German population without a viable economic base.
He recounted issuing unauthorized instructions intended to preserve coal mines, ore facilities and other productive assets as German forces withdrew from western areas.
The defence introduced Speer's March 1945 memorandum warning Hitler that systematic destruction of industry, transport and supply facilities would make post-war survival and reconstruction far more difficult.
Robert Jackson cross-examined Speer about the reach of his authority, his knowledge of labour conditions and the extent to which ministerial responsibility followed from wartime decisions.
Soviet prosecutor Mikhail Raginsky questioned Speer about exploitation of occupied territories and sought to connect his economic administration with wartime plunder and removal of resources.
On redirect examination, Speer explained that his acceptance of common responsibility referred to leadership responsibility before Germany and history, while leaving criminal liability for the Tribunal to decide.
After final questions and submission of supporting documents, Speer's counsel closed the evidentiary presentation of his defence before the International Military Tribunal.
Grothmann provides evidence for the defence concerning SS administration and his service within Heinrich Himmler's personal staff.
Generated from the World History Database historical_events table. Identical display records are collapsed; descriptions otherwise retain the stored text. Coverage and source quality vary. Check primary and specialist sources before citing individual historical claims.